‘Blu-ray or Bust’
FANTASTIC BEASTS: THE
CRIMES OF GRINDELWALD (2018, PG-13/NR, 134/142 minutes, HEYDAY FILMS/WARNER
BROTHERS)
It’s funny, what a few extra minutes can do.
In some cases, it makes an okay film great (WATCHMEN, BATMAN V SUPERMAN);
those extra minutes, whether they are in the single digits or total dozens, can
flesh out a story, make the characters richer and the story more meaningful
than in its original release, even if you didn’t even realize the film could
benefit so heavily from their inclusion (see: every HOBBIT/RING movie).
That being said, I wasn’t terribly pleased with the theatrical release of
THE CRIMES OF GRINDLEWALD. The editing felt jumpy, the story clunky, the
characters too one-sided. Watching it, I got the feeling that there was quite a
bit missing from this messy, and at times overwrought, sequel. And I had high
expectations for it; coming off the brilliant FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO
FIND THEM, I was wholly invested in writer J.K. Rowling’s efforts as a
screenwriter. So my disappointment with the second of a planned five-film story
left me at odds. Could the series withstand this entry? Would it wind up
costing the studio too much with future installments, seeing as how the gamble
did not pay off with this one? (After all, the film cost an estimated two
hundred million to make, and grossed less than that domestically. To be fair,
it did cross the six-hundred million mark worldwide, but that is still cutting
it close when it comes to the movie business.) And most importantly, would I be
attacked by rabid Potterheads who see my reviews as nothing more than hobo
vomit spewed from a fast-moving train hauling cow poo and cabbage?
With the video release of the film, I was pleased to see an extended cut of
the film—and if it were not for the irritating inclusion of the words “Deleted
Scene” every time one came up, this iteration of the film far surpasses the
theatrical release. I can understand having to cut a film’s original runtime
because of an audience’s possible fatigue, but at the cost of the story and the
flow of the film…well, as a movie fan, it sucks donkey nipples. Back in the
day, there used to be such a thing as an “intermission” (Google it, I don’t
have time to fully explain…). Yet in this day and age of assembly line customer
processing, theaters aren’t given enough time to provide viewers with breaks.
Thankfully, home video allows us the opportunity to see how the filmmakers
originally intended a film to be seen. In the case of CRIMES, it helps
tremendously. The story flows rather seamlessly now, and you are allowed more
time to identify with and feel compassion for the plight of Credence (the
marvelous Ezra Miller) and the doomed Nagini (the quite flexible Claudia Kim).
The choice of Johnny Depp for sympathetic baddie Grindelwald makes more sense
here, and Eddie Redmayne’s Newt Scamander has more time to shine with Jude
Law’s Dumbledore. Essentially, when you put the disc in, head straight to the
special features and watch the Director’s Cut.
Speaking of the special features, skip the second one. It’s basically Ezra
Miller and Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood of the HARRY POTTER films) geeking out
together, and adds absolutely nothing to the viewing experience. The others are
your usual documentaries—nothing too special, but nothing else as bad as that
second one.
The third chapter in the series is due out next year—in November, if the
release date holds true to the others. With as much story as was packed into
CRIMES, I hope that Ms. Rowling switches gears a bit next time. While I
appreciate a Director’s Cut, it shouldn’t always be necessary.
Film Grade: B+ (the theatrical cut gets a B-)
Special Features: B
Blu-ray Necessary: You bet your niffler
-- T.S. Kummelman
No comments:
Post a Comment