‘Bluray or Bust’
ANNIHILATION (2018, R,
115 Minutes, SKYDANCE MEDIA/PARAMOUNT PICTURES)
When I first saw the trailers for writer/director Alex Garland’s
ANNIHILATION, I was intrigued by the auteur’s idea. After all, his Academy Award winning 2014 EX
MACHINA was a lovely, mechanically violent ballet that ended on a hopeful note
for Skynet and all the other evil machines that want to send robots to kill all
mankind.
But it was also a film that closely followed a prior iteration of the same
concept, the British film THE MACHINE.
That film was about scientists accidentally creating a robot that became
aware of itself—a female robot, one which was designed to kill, yet grew a
conscience. Garlands’s EX was about a dude creating sex robots and AI. Which may not seem like much of a similarity,
until you address the fact that the machine in each film had the same freaking
name: Ava.
EX MACHINA was not a bad film—on the contrary, it netted newcomer Alicia
Vikander several award nominations for her portrayal of the robot. Caity Lotz of “Arrow” fame also received no
small amount of attention for her portrayal of Eva in the other female robot
movie. I’m not dropping any accusations
here; there are oftentimes when I watch a film that I think it could have been
better had the writer taken the story in a different direction. I won’t say that MACHINA was better than
MACHINE (do I need to point out the similarity in the titles? Anyone?), as both were terribly good films. Yet comparisons beyond what I have pointed
out could be made.
What intrigued me about ANNIHILATION is that the film’s premise looked
eerily similar to 2016’s ARRIVAL: something alien in origin plants itself on
earth in a remote setting, a barrier goes up, stuff starts getting weird, and heads
start getting screwed with. While
ARRIVAL seemed more concerned with the moral dilemmas presented by the arrival
of aliens, ANNIHILATION seemed more of a monster movie on the surface. Like, aliens show up and create this barrier,
and after you go through it you never come back because something eats your
face off. Remember the barrier in
ARRIVAL?
Okay, really, not trying to point out the obvious here (both movies also
have one word titles), as I’m not throwing any accusations around (and both of
them start with the letter “A”)—hell, I’m a hack movie reviewer/critic/jackass
that never finished college—but while watching ANNIHILATION, you almost get the
feeling that Garland saw ARRIVAL and thought “yeah, but wouldn’t it be better
if someone got their face eaten off?”, and then sat down and started writing.
Nothing wrong with that, kids—we all have those thoughts, we all sometimes
wish a film or a book or one of our teenagers would maybe go in a different
direction. It doesn’t mean there is any
plagiarizing going on here, and it certainly doesn’t mean that Garland was
trying to re-do something Denis Villeneuve already did. ANNIHILATION is a strong enough film on its
own, just as EX MACHINA was. The writing
is strong, the acting stronger (a mostly female cast led by Natalie Portman and
the nearly emotionless Jennifer Jason Leigh), and the visuals are stunning. There is a consistency in Garland’s detail
that you cannot help but notice, most importantly the use of color in the
scenes once the cast crosses into The Shimmer, that aforementioned barrier that
seems to be encompassing more and more of our planet as the days go on. There are bright hues and colorful prisms in
nearly every shot. And when it is
compared to our drab earth, it is a shock meant to make you think ‘what if?’,
as in ‘what if they just let this alien stuff take over… at least everything
would look like it had been assaulted by Skittles, and everyone loves freaking
Skittles’.
Even if this isn’t a case of “could be better if they did this instead”,
Garland creates images and sequences which may stick with you. And don’t judge the rest of the film by this
complaint/observation, but the true form of the “alien” could have been better
executed, meaning (slight SPOILER ALERT) better sound effects and please, for
the love of the Sweet Baby Hey-Zeus, less dubstep. Seriously.
At any rate, you should check the film out on Blu-ray—those visuals are quite
lovely, and the score, which is occasionally difficult to distinguish from the
audio effects, is rich enough to utilize the base in your surround sound. There are four informative docs, including an
interesting look at the half-sunken fishing shack, and how they shot the film
sequentially—not something every filmmaker has the opportunity to do.
Don’t ignore this film just because I, jackass extraordinaire, made a
couple of silly comparisons. But I will
most certainly use it as a platform to get you to go watch THE MACHINE. Just because.
Grade: B+
Special Features: A-
Blu-ray Necessary: Most Definitely
-- T.S. Kummelman
No comments:
Post a Comment