“SKumm’s Thoughts”
THE SHAPE OF WATER
(2017, R, 123 minutes, BULL PRODUCTIONS/FOX SEARCHLIGHT)
Guillermo del Toro is like that weird kid in school—you
know, the one always drawing imaginary creatures and wearing Slayer
t-shirts. Not that there’s anything
wrong with that; I write about imaginary creatures and wear Beastie Boys and
ALIEN t-shirts.
But imagine that kid with a lot of money and influence (see:
NOT ME). What would be his best avenue
for spreading his ideas and musings? On
film, of course—and his latest creation is one which deserves a heckuva lot
more attention than it is getting.
At its heart, THE SHAPE OF WATER is a love story. It is also a love letter to monster movies of
the fifties, a film about prejudice, a musical, a story shaped by the wonders
and horrors of humanity, and soulful communication without words. Sally Hawkins (PADDINGTON, GODZILLA) plays
Elisa Esposito, a mute cleaning lady at a facility which houses unique “assets”. She and her partner Zelda (Octavia Spencer of
THE HELP and HIDDEN FIGURES) are tasked with cleaning a lab housing an
amphibious humanoid (Doug Jones, “Star Trek: Discovery”, HELLBOY), an asset
captured in South America and transported to the lab by Richard Strickland,
played with joyous, evil abandon by the versatile Michael Shannon (MAN OF
STEEL, MIDNIGHT SPECIAL). Strickland is
your typical vile government official who understands only that the creature is
important because of its difference to humans; he wants to take it apart, while
the scientists wish to study it. And
somehow, Elisa, amidst all of Strickland’s torture tactics and fear, falls in
love with it.
There are elements to this film that seem eerily familiar to
other del Toro works, from the oppressive bad guy to the misunderstood
creature. By setting the story in the
era during which fear of the Soviet Union and rage against people of color
reign supreme, he adds a number of aspects to the film which mirror the
fantastical aspects of his script. Like
CHRONOS and the brilliant THE DEVIL’S BACKBONE, del Toro has crafted a
fairytale for adults that need a good fable.
And never has his voice seemed clearer, and never has his visual style
appeared so vividly. Working with a
small budget (no CGI here, kids), the filmmaker creates a world within our
world, making it at times tonally reverent, and at others strikingly
harsh. And you’ve never seen Sally
Hawkins quite like this; her body language alone should be taught in film
schools, not to mention how she makes you believe that beauty really could fall
in love with the beast.
I mentioned a few weeks ago how I’m usually dead wrong when
it comes to picking the Oscar winners; after all, I’m just that weird kid with
a laptop, internet access, and an opinion.
And a butt-load of movie inspired t-shirts. But what del Toro pulls off with such a small
budget (under twenty-million is considered small for a genre busting “horror”
film) should earn him a Best Director win at the Academy Awards. The performances he elicits, and the sets he
built—hell, the story he crafted and imagined in his head, to see it come to
life onscreen… well, other directors have won for less. When you consider that he had a hand in every
conceivable detail, from the lighting and the color schemes to the obvious
stuff like acting and cinematography, del Toro’s performance here is one that
should be revered and, yes, lauded.
Weird kids of the world unite—that other awkward kid from
shop class has made himself a masterpiece.
Grade: A+
No comments:
Post a Comment