The 'Not-So-Critical' Critic:
on THE
CONJURING 2 (2016, 134 minutes, R)
The Quick of It -
As sequels go, this film does a fair job. Director James Wan returns to helm this horror flick and proves
he is not losing ground in the genre.
Lorraine and Ed Warren are called to London by the church to help a
troubled family who is plagued by a malicious spirit.
The writing starts off shaky as the dialogue feels like a film
student’s project when introducing the characters and building the story’s
foundation. The exchanges were too far
from natural to be comfortable with, pulling you out of the scene. But as you progress, everything settles in
and the scares start to distract.
Wan has now proven himself a master at building tension. He keeps with a tried-and-true process,
getting you to hold your breath at those special moments. This film doesn’t play on the realistic as
much as it does the grounded reality of everyday life. You, as a part of the audience, get the
multiple viewpoints so are privy to everything happening, but are also find
yourself questioning the occurrences with the skeptics, and then suddenly
realize you have already seen that they are proven wrong. This has to be a mark of good story-building
to get that kind of response as you are sitting there taking it in.
I hate to say the acting is only passable, but it is excusable. The kids do a better job than some of the
adult actors, which is key since the story is driven by the children in more
ways the to two lead adults. The
setting allows for play in realism and proven documentation since the 70’s were
not know for their recording technology.
This gives license to the director to push the envelope further when
dealing with the apparitions.
The hard question of “Is this better than the first?” is a tough
one. I think it could be. As horror goes, this doesn’t strongly rely
on the jump scares or the fantastic images, it blends all the aspects of a good
ghost story and gives you a full experience.
Grade: A-